On Thursday, the Niger State High Court’s Justice Mikail Aliyu dismissed the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s money laundering prosecution against former Niger State Governor Babangida Aliyu and two other individuals, Tanko Beji and Umar Nasko.
The EFCC was pursuing legal action against the trio for alleged criminal breach of trust, conspiracy, and misappropriation of over N2 billion in ecological monies.
The EFCC revealed this in a statement on Thursday night that our correspondent was able to receive.
The statement said, “At today’s sitting, prosecution lawyer Faruk Abdallah concluded the prosecution’s case, relying on an application dated October 24 and filed on October 26, 2022.
“Addressing the court, he said the prosecution through the testimonies of witnesses and documents tendered in the course of the trial had established a prima facie case against the defendants to warrant them to open their defence.
“The first defendant was the Executive Governor of Niger State; it presupposes therefore that by virtue of his position, he held the resources of his state in trust. A public office is a position of trust. Under the watch of the first accused person, monies were transferred from an account domiciled in Government House, the monies were diverted for personal gains. These facts have been sufficiently shown to the court through the prosecution witnesses and exhibits,” he said.
Counsel for the first defendant, Oladije Ayodele, SAN, however informed the court that the prosecution failed to establish the crime and moved for a no case submission. “The prosecution has been unable to defend the charge. I wish to draw your lordship’s attention to state that there was no evidence of the crime. We are at a stage where we will look at the evidence. They are saying they have established a prima facie case, but my prayer is that they have not established a prima facie case.”
INEC Sends Warning To APC, PDP, Others As They Resume Voters Registration
Also, counsel for the second defendant, Ibrahim Isiyaku, SAN, informed the court that the defence had entered a no case submission, adding, “the second defendant is standing trial for two counts, one and three; conspiracy and criminal breach of trust. It was required of the prosecution to establish that the second defendant intentionally aided the first defendant to dishonestly convert certain sums of money for the use of the first accused person.”
“The second charge relating to conspiracy cannot be sustained, we urge the court to sustain our submission, uphold a no case submission,” he said.
The counsel for the third defendant, Mamman Osman, SAN, also informed the court that he had filed a no case submission and prayed the court to discharge the third defendant.
Responding to the submissions of the defence counsel, Abdallah urged the court to dismiss their no case submission and direct them to enter their defense.
Justice Mikail, thereafter, adjourned till February 16, 2023 for ruling on the application.
Follow us on Facebook
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author and forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of Anaedo Online or official policies of the Anaedo Online.