'Read Psalm 82 Daily' - Nnamdi Kanu Asks Supporters As He Accuses Tinubu Govt Of Planning To Detain Him Indefinitely

UPDATE: Court Takes Action On Nnamdi Kanu’s Suit Against DSS

by Victor Ndubuisi
A+A-
Reset

The adoption of procedures in the lawsuit brought by Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), against the Department of State Services (DSS), was set for adoption on June 20 by the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday.

The court registrar set the date in response to Justice Binta Nyako’s absence, who was rumored to have left on a business trip.

According to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), the court warned DSS and Kanu’s attorneys on May 3 to avoid cutting the next postponed date’s hearings short.

Malami’s Petition Against Nnamdi Kanu Before DSS (Full Details)

Following the day’s proceedings, which were halted because DSS attorney Idowu Awo requested an oral extension of time to respond to a further affidavit served on him by Kanu’s lawyer, Mike Ozekhome, in the open court.

Advertisement

According to NAN, Kanu sued the DSS and its Director General as the first and second respondents in the case through his legal team.

Kanu requested permission from the court in the lawsuit with the file number FHC/ABJ/CS/2341/2022 to file for a mandamus order to compel the DSS to provide him unrestricted access to his doctor and other parties.

On February 1, following an ex-parte motion by Ozekhome, the court had allowed Kanu permission to request a mandamus order.

The DSS asked the court to reject the case for lack of jurisdiction in a preliminary objection that it submitted.

LATEST NEWS: Nnamdi Kanu About To Be Killed By The DSS – IPOB

The DSS had argued that there was an ongoing decision of a sister court made by Justice Taiwo Taiwo on June 3, 2022, in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1585/2021 between Kanu and the DG of DSS and two others, wherein the court had largely addressed the question of allowing the IPOB leader access to his personal physician.

It stated that the current lawsuit was comparable to the first one and that Kanu had appealed the decision.

Advertisement

 

Follow us on Facebook

Post Disclaimer

The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author and forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of Anaedo Online or official policies of the Anaedo Online.

Advertisement

You may also like

Advertisement