Alleging behaviours and activities unworthy of high ranking lawyers, the National Working Committee of the All Progressives Grand Alliance, or APGA, has sent a petition to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee, or LPDC, against a number of top legal practitioners.
Victor Agunzi, Esq., P. I. N. Ikwueto, SAN, and Dr. Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN, were the targets of the petition.
The APGA NWC requests that the LPDC look into the aforementioned attorneys and take any necessary measures against them.
APGA Crisis: Edozie Njoku, Victor Oye Factions Battle For Structure In Abia
The APGA NWC noted in the petition, which was filed by its National Secretary Muhyideen Imam, that Ikpeazu, Ikwueto, and their partner, Agunzi, who is Chief Victor Ike Oye’s representative, had flagrantly disregarded court orders, including decisions made by the highest court.
According to Anaedoonline.ng, the political party has been rocked by legal disputes ever since the Jigawa State High Court (Suit No. JDU/022/2021) disputed Chief Edozie Njoku’s election as the party’s National Chairman in 2021.
In its petition, APGA NWC claimed that the senior solicitors had persisted in deceiving their client, who had been disobeying various court decisions in an attempt to remove the legitimate party leadership.
It claimed that top solicitors are acting in a way that denigrates and mocks the court’s reputation and integrity rather than defending the court and the rule of law.
APGA Set to Suspend Governor Soludo Over Alleged Anti-Party Activities
Additionally, they are charged with using a variety of strategies to prevent the court from proceeding steadily with the dispensing with the matter speedily.
The petitioners recalled that the court’s ruling, which mandated the following actions, had just been followed by the Independent National Electoral Commission, or INEC:
“The act(s) of the Respondents refusing to obey and comply with the subsisting judgments of the Supreme Court made on the 14th October, 2021 and corrected on the 24th March, 2023 and duly served on them amounts to disobedience of the Judgments and Orders of the Supreme Court.
“a. The actions of the 1st Respondent posing and parading himself and occupying the Party’s Secretariat as the National Chairman of APGA contrary to the judgment and order of the Supreme Court made on the 14th October, 2021 and corrected on the 24th March, 2023 is in disobedience of the Judgments of the Supreme Court.
Obinna Ngonadi Dumps APGA For Labour Party, Eyes House of Reps
“b. An Order of injunction is hereby granted restraining the 2nd Respondent, whether by itself, agents, privies, assigns, authorized representatives or whosoever described from accepting, recognizing and dealing with the 1st Respondent.
“c. The Respondents must comply with the decision of the Supreme Court made on the 14th October, 2021 and subsequently corrected on the 24th March, 2023, which was exhibited as Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 4(A & B) in the supporting affidavit of the Originating Summons which has also been served on them.
“d. It is hereby declared that all the actions taken or to be taken by the 1st respondent (as the Chairman of APGA) and the 2nd Respondent as regards to congresses, conventions, primaries, meetings or flags off campaign of any kind whatsoever in disregard and disobedience to the judgment of the Supreme Court, attached as Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 4(A & B) in the affidavit in support of the Originating Summons made on the 14th of October, 2021 and subsequently corrected on the 24th March, 2023 are unlawful, illegal, null, void and of no effect whatsoever.”
The petitioners noted that in their desperations to undo everything in favour of their client, even with their pending appeals to the Supreme Court challenging the decisions of the Court of Appeal, the same senior counsel have inspired and taken up fresh suits at the Federal High Courts Abuja and Anambra State, in disguise to re-litigating matters bothering on the internal affairs of a political party, already resolved by the Courts, even to the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal.
“Their actions only suggest the counsel are forum shopping and attempting to subtly coercing the High Courts to seat on appeals, over the decisions of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal. These clearly are the highest level of abuse of the Court process and a clear attempt capable of scandalizing and ridiculing the court system, which these desperate senior counsels must not be allowed to do,” the petition read in part.
Anaedoonline.ng reports that the fresh suits inspired and filed by the senior counsel for and on behalf of their client, are:
a. Suit No. FHC/AWK/CS/263/2023: SIR OJUKWU OBAKASI V. INEC & ORS, pending at the Federal High Court, Awka, Anambra State; and
UPDATE: No Plan To Suspend Soludo – APGA Reveals
b. Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/966/2024: APGA & ANOR V. INEC & ANOR, pending at the Federal High Court, Abuja, FCT.
APGA added, “It is said, that litigation must have an end and it is the duty of counsel as ministers in the temple of justice, to advice and counsel their clients in line with the law and in upholding the ethical professional code, guiding legal practitioners in their practice of law.
“In this case, the conducts and actions of these senior counsel are not only inimical to their oath as Legal Practitioners, but also against the rule of law, especially as Senior Advocates of Nigeria, who owe the profession a duty to uphold its integrity as the pacesetters and the light of the society.
“Our complaint as stated above is borne out of the respect we have for the legal profession and the ideals it holds, which in our respectful opinion are lacking in the way and manner these senior counsel conducted themselves in the matters stated above.
“We, therefore, employ you to use your good office and consider our complaint and take necessary actions that will deter desperate practitioners of your noble profession from portraying you in bad light before the right-thinking members of the society.”
Follow us on Facebook
Post Disclaimer
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author and forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of Anaedo Online or official policies of the Anaedo Online.