Tribunal Dismisses Nnamani’s Petition, Awards Costs

by Mercy Ulasi
A+A-
Reset

The National Assembly Election Petitions Tribunal in Enugu rejected the challenge to Senator Chimaroke Nnamani of the People’s Democratic Party and affirmed Senator Kelvin Chukwu of the Labour Party’s election to the Senate on Wednesday.

The three-member panel headed by Justice Nusirat I. Umar declared Chukwu to be the duly elected senator for the Enugu East Senatorial District of Enugu State. Chukwu succeeded his brother Oyibo Chukwu, who was brutally killed a few days before the election.

Nnamani, who was the former Enugu State governor between 1999 and 2007, represented Enugu East Senatorial District in the 9th Assembly under the platform of the PDP. Despite winning the ticket for the PDP to recontest the senatorial seat in the February 25 National Assembly elections; he declared support for the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress, Bola Tinubu, against his party’s candidate, Atiku Abubakar.

Plenary: Senate Confirms Chukwu As INEC REC

Although the PDP expelled him, he still contested under the platform but lost to the LP candidate, Kelvin Chukwu.
The Independent National Electoral Commission had declared Chukwu the winner of the Enugu East Senatorial District poll after scoring 69,000 votes to defeat Nnamani, who polled a total of 49,000 votes.

Advertisement

However, Nnamani had approached the tribunal challenging the election on grounds that the election was marred by over-voting, irregularities, election malpractices, and non-compliance with the electoral guidelines.

The ex-governor, who is the founder of the Ebeano political family, also urged the court to declare him the rightful winner of the election or invalidate the results of the polls.
But delivering its ruling on Wednesday, the tribunal dismissed the petition and awarded a cost of N500,000 against the petitioners in favour of the three respondents, Kelvin Chukwu, LP, and INEC.

In dismissing the petition, the Justices held that the petition was “vague, lacking in merit, incompetent, generic, and an academic exercise.”

 

Follow us on facebook

Post Disclaimer

The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author and forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of Anaedo Online or official policies of the Anaedo Online.

You may also like

Advertisement