Peter Obi Urges Obidient Support Groups To Account For Money Collected During Campaign/Election

Peter Obi Criticizes Tinubu Over 50% Reduction In Transportation Cost

by Victor Ndubuisi
A+A-
Reset

President Bola Tinubu has come under fire from Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s (LP) presidential contender for 2023, regarding the 50% national cut in transit rates that was implemented during the Yelutide.

According to Anaedoonline.ng, President Tinubu said that interstate road users will not have to pay transit fees throughout the Christmas and New Year’s holidays.

According to Tinubu, during the holiday season, the federal government will pay 50% of the transportation costs for those travelling across the nation on interstate roads.

UPDATE: Court Dismisses Asset Declaration Suit Against Peter Obi

Peter Obi voiced his displeasure with the development in a statement via X, raising concerns about what would happen to Nigerians once the holiday season ends and what would happen to those who had already travelled before the transport cut announcement.

Advertisement

According to the former governor of the state of Anambra, an inquiry reveals that numerous transporters in national parks were not compliant with the federal government’s order.

According to Peter Obi, the policy should have been appealing to the majority of people, particularly the oppressed, and he said that a thoughtful and formal agreement should have been reached with transport companies.

He said, “I read the reports of the President’s approval of a 50 percent slash in the price of interstate transport fare for Nigerians travelling during this Yuletide from Thursday 21, 2023, to January 4, 2024. The news reports added that the President approved free rides for commuters on all train services within the period. If fully implemented, as reported, I consider this first-time intervention of the government, intended to help the masses, a step in the right direction. However, the major concern about such emergency measures is what follows afterwards. The high cost of transportation and associated hardships are all well known. The question this seasonal palliative raises is that of what happens after the festive season. Is there a sustainable policy measure to cushion the masses from the current high transportation costs? Even the current effort comes with operational challenges. Millions of people have already traveled bearing the brunt and huge costs of such travels. How will such people get their refunds or be compensated? Following the government’s announcement of a 50% discount on interstate transport fare for Nigerians, I have taken time to inquire into the implementation mechanics across different cities but I have been disappointed.

UPDATE: Poverty Knows no Ethnicity or Religion – Peter Obi

“Today, I sent out contacts who consulted widely with the transporters in major parks across the country: in Abuja they carried out on the spot investigation in Jabi/Utako areas; in Lagos they visited major parks like Jibowu, Festac, Mile 12, Ajah, and Mazamaza and none of the transporters in these parks was aware of this 50% discount. At Upper Iweka, Onitsha, which is the main traffic hub in Anambra, and in other parts of the country like; Kano, Aba, Kaduna, Owerri, and Gombe, the story is the same. The government has again announced the few transport companies chosen to participate in the intervention for which 28 Routes have been designated. There are no announced forms of checks and balances to ensure that the transporters follow the terms of the contract.

“There are obvious questions on the integrity of this intervention effort. One expects that such a policy that strives to appeal to the broad masses, especially the downtrodden, deliberate and concrete arrangements should be made, with transport companies. I pray that this is not yet another spin to curry favour in the media space after appetizing the people. The Nigerian people are going through untold hardship and the government must not remain insensitive to their sufferings. Compassion on the part of government is a good thing, but it should not be an avenue for exploiting the weak structures of government to encourage less than transparent policy implementation.”

 

Advertisement

Follow us on Facebook

Post Disclaimer

The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author and forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of Anaedo Online or official policies of the Anaedo Online.

You may also like

Advertisement