Resolution of Southern Governors On Open Grazing Is Constitutional — SAN

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, has thrown his weight behind southern governors on their stand on open grazing, saying it is constitutional to place a ban.

This is just as he lampooned the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, for his comment on open grazing; Adegboruwa expressed that the AGF does not have the constitutional power to make a proclamation for the country.

“The proponents of open grazing support it with the right to freedom of movement granted under section 41 of the Constitution. This section cannot be interpreted to violate other constitutional provisions, especially section 43 that grants the right to private or public property.

Southern Govs Tasked To Send Bills Banning Open Grazing To State Assemblies

“You cannot deploy the right to movement of person and cattle to violate the right of another citizen to own property, such as land or farmland, or else you become a trespasser.

It is in this regard that I disagree with the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation when he said that the ban on open grazing is unconstitutional. That cannot represent a proper interpretation of the Constitution, with all due respect.

“The AGF is a member of the Executive arm of government, under section 5 of the Constitution. The Constitution has not assigned any role to the AGF to make proclamations for the country. To that extent, his comment is ultra vires, being beyond and outside his office as a Minister.

The role of interpreting the Constitution is the exclusive preserve of the Courts under the Constitution,” he said.

The activist SAN charged the Houses of Assembly of the States that have proscribed open grazing to go ahead to make laws to support their declarations. “It is only after then that the AGF can approach the court for judicial interpretation.

Ban of Open Grazing In The South Is A Declaration of War —Miyetti Allah Reveals

“I urge the Governors to proceed speedily, with the implementation of their lawful and courageous declarations, and not be misled, intimidated, or distracted by the comments from the federal government.

“There is no doubt that we cannot generalise, to say that all “Fulani herdsmen” are guilty of violence and destruction, but we must tackle those criminals who have invaded their ranks, for purposes other than grazing.

Truth is, genuine Fulani herdsmen offer food, dairy, employment, and prosperity for the land and this is desirable. The ban on open grazing is, therefore, necessary to protect the genuine herdsmen and help preserve their vocation from the marauders,” he said.

 

Follow us on Facebook