The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has been sued by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) regarding activities related to the general elections of 2023.
According to Newsmen, the Rights group had filed a lawsuit against the electoral commission because it had not looked into claims of election violence and other electoral offenses, including as bribery, against some state governors and their appointees during the recently finished elections.
The electoral commission was forewarned by SERAP to swiftly identify and apprehend those responsible for electoral violence or risk legal action, according to a statement made accessible to newsmen on Sunday.
SERAP Drags Buhari To Court Over 130 Million Nigerians In Poverty
“We would be grateful if immediate steps are taken to implement the recommended measures within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall consider appropriate legal actions to compel INEC to comply with our request in the public interest,” the rights organisation said.
The SERAP, in a statement made available on Sunday, April 30, said it was asking the court for “an order of mandamus compelling INEC to seek the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate allegations of electoral offences against state governors and their deputies during the 2023 elections.”
In a suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/583/2023 before the Federal High Court, Abuja, SERAP is also seeking “an order of mandamus compelling INEC to promptly, thoroughly and effectively investigate reports of electoral violence and other electoral offences committed during the elections, identify suspected perpetrators and their sponsors, and ensure their effective prosecution.”
The organisation argued that suspected perpetrators and their sponsors had “clearly” acted in violation of constitutional provisions, international standards and the Electoral Act by allegedly engaging in electoral violence and other electoral offences “in so blatant a fashion.”
FG Warned By Cherubim And Seraphim Against Arresting Peter Obi’
SERAP emphasized once more that prosecuting politicians and their sponsors who are thought to have been involved in electoral offenses would put an end to the offenders’ impunity.
“It would also advance Nigerians’ right to freely participate in their own government,” it said. SERAP further argued that addressing the brazen impunity and reports of electoral violence and other electoral offences during the 2023 general elections would send a strong message to politicians that they would be held to account for any infringement of the electoral process.
The suit, filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare, Andrew Nwankwo and Blessing Ogwuche, added: “Election violence is a threat to fair and representative elections.
“Election violence is inconsistent and incompatible with the principles of democracy, the rule of law, transparency and accountability for politicians to allegedly use violence to disrupt the electoral process.
“Section 52 of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act allows INEC to seek the appointment of an independent counsel to probe allegations of electoral violence and other electoral offences that may have been committed by any state governors and/or their deputies.
“When politicians and their sponsors decide to engage in electoral violence and other electoral offences rather than contest fairly for people’s votes, there are possibilities that such politicians will disregard democratic rules, and a disposition to adopt illegal means becomes inevitable.
Presidency Slams SERAP Over Plan To Sue Buhari Govt
“Ending impunity for electoral violence and other electoral offences would promote accountability of suspected perpetrators and their sponsors, ensure justice for victims, and ultimately advance the people’s right to vote and bolster voter confidence in the electoral process.
“Electoral violence and other electoral offences reportedly committed during the 2023 general elections are contrary to the express provisions of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended], the Electoral Act and international standards.
“The Nigerian Constitution provides in Section 14(1)(c) that ‘the participation by the people in their government shall be ensured following the provisions of this Constitution.’
“Sections 121 and 127 of the Electoral Act prohibit electoral bribery and undue influence before, during and after any election.
“Section 145(2) provides that, ‘a prosecution under this Act shall be undertaken by legal officers of INEC or any legal practitioner appointed by it.’ Under section 2(b), the commission ‘shall have the power to promote knowledge of sound democratic election processes.’
“According to a report by the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD), several polling units recorded violence and/or fighting across the country.
Stop Buhari Govt From Selling National Assets – SERAP Asks National Assembly
“These violent incidents were often focused in political strongholds of opposition or perceived opponents, which suggest that the use of BVAS – which limits overvoting when properly used – has resulted in a more concerted effort to stymie citizens casting their votes in opponent’s strongholds.
“Similar incidents of intimidation were reported in the six geo-political zones.
“In several states, political thugs, apparently with the support of law enforcement officials, disrupted and sent back voters intending to vote for opposition parties. Party agents were reported to be directing people who to vote for, while those unwilling to do as directed were denied ballot papers and forced to leave the polling units.
“There were reports of destruction of used ballot papers and vandalization of entire polling units in some states. Violence was also used to target BVAS machines in order to disrupt the process and ensure the cancellation of results.
LATEST: Probe Attack On Peter Obi – SERAP Asks Buhari
“According to the CDD, there are reports of vote-trading in zones across the country, with both cash and goods used by all political parties in an effort to entice voters to cast their ballots at their direction. The CDD noted vote buying at polling units during the elections across the country.”
Follow us on Facebook
Post Disclaimer
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author and forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of Anaedo Online or official policies of the Anaedo Online.