Supreme Court Affirms Mbah’s Election As Enugu Governor

Enugu Tribunal Orders Gov Mbah’s Appearance June 23 Over Alleged Certificate Forgery

by Victor Ndubuisi
A+A-
Reset

Governor Peter Mbah has been summoned to appear before the Enugu State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal tomorrow, Friday.

According to news sources, the ruling was issued in response to an application submitted by the Peoples Redemption Party, PRP, through its counsel, Barr Alex Amujiogo.

Elder Christopher Agu, a PRP candidate, is in court trying to overturn the announcement of Barr Peter Mbah as the victor of the March 18 governorship election in the state.

Enugu Tribunal: ‘You’ve Till June 22 To Respond To Academic Records Suit Filed By Edeoga’ – Court Tells Mbah

He further claims that Mbah was unable to run in the election because he reportedly falsified his National Youth Service Corps, NYSC, discharge certificate, among other things.

Advertisement

At the resumption of the hearing, Amujiogo, the PRP’s counsel, informed the tribunal that Mbah was expected to be in court as a subpoenaed witness.

According to the declaration testified to by the bailiff of the Tribunal, he had difficulty serving Mbah the summon.

Amujiogo then filed an application with the Tribunal, requesting that the summons be served on Mbah through his counsel instead of personally.

Although the three respondents, INEC, Mbah, and the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, objected to the application on the grounds that it should have been made by motion backed by an affidavit during the pre-trial session, the Tribunal overruled them.

NYSC Tenders Evidence Against Gov Peter Mbah In Court

Justice K. M. Akano, Chairman of the Panel, directed that the subpoena be served on Mbah through his attorney and that he come before the Tribunal tomorrow, June 23, 2023.

Agu, the PRP’s gubernatorial candidate during the election, had previously testified before the Tribunal as PW2.

Advertisement

Barr. Aliu Muhammed, an official of the NYSC from the National Secretariat in Abuja, who also appeared on behalf of the Corps’ Director-General, tendered an affidavit to the Tribunal, declaring that an order of a Federal High Court in Abuja was preventing them from tendering the disclaimer the Corps made against Mbah’s certificate.

“Our PW2 (Christopher Agu) has already testified before the Honourable Tribunal and he has given a clearer picture, the synopsis of what transpired during the election and we are urging the Tribunal to set aside the purported result in favour of Peter Mbah, the Governor,” Amujiogo told journalists after the Tribunal’s sitting.

Tribunal: Suit Against Gov Mbah’s Alleged Nysc Certificate Forgery Heard In Court Today

Advertisement

“We had an issue of subpoena against Barr Peter Ndubuisi Mbah, in which the Tribunal is urging him to appear before it to clarify certain issues against him, based on his NYSC certificate and other matters.

“Surprisingly, he was not in the Tribunal today and the bailiff informed the Tribunal that he is invading service, he cannot find him, the security cannot allow him to serve Mbah the subpoena.

“Then, the Tribunal in its own wisdom, after I have applied, has now permitted the bailiff or myself, to now serve Mbah through his counsel, for him to appear before the Tribunal tomorrow, being 23rd of June, 2023 and clarify certain issues against him before the Tribunal and we have already served him the said subpoena through his lawyer, Ik Onuoma today in court.

Advertisement

“So he must obey the summon of the Tribunal by appearing in person tomorrow, Friday.”

Meanwhile, the Labour Party, LP, gubernatorial candidate, Barr Chijioke Edeoga, appeared before the Tribunal.

Gov Peter Mbah Makes Case For Nnamdi Kanu’s Release For Peace In South East

The Tribunal heard Edeoga’s pending application, and the case was deferred for a judgement on the application he submitted before the Tribunal, as well as a pre-trial report.

Barr Ifeanyi Ogenyi, one of his counsels, told journalists after the session that the process was a continuation of the pre-hearing session.

Advertisement

According to him, “Pre-hearing started on 16th June and continued today; the petitioners brought an application, a motion interrogatories, seeking for answers from the second respondent, that is Mr Peter Mbah.

“Interrogatory is a legal questionnaire; it is seeking for answers to those questions.

“And some of the questions raised by the petitioners to Peter Mbah which we are urging the Tribunal that he (Mbah) should answer are: when and where did he serve? When was he appointed as Chief of Staff, the date? When was he made commissioner for finance in Enugu State? We want to know the duration he served.

“Because in his pleading, in his reply to the petition, he told the Tribunal that he was once Chief of Staff to Governor Chimaroke Nnamani in 2003, we want to know the year and the date he was appointed.

Advertisement

Enugu: How I Will Run My Administration – Governor-elect, Peter Mbah

“We equally want him to produce before the Tribunal, the letter of appointment as Chief of Staff, the letter of appointment as commissioner for finance under Chimaroke and the institutions he said he attended; we want to have the documents showing that he attended those institutions.

“And the court is to deliver a ruling on that on 24th of June, that is on Saturday, whether he should answer those questions or not.”

Advertisement

“On their own side, they said ‘No’, they are not going to answer those questions; that answering those questions means that we want him to prove our case for us.

“But that is not the position. It is required under the law that where somebody has made volunteered some information, you can seek for further particulars;

“What we are seeking for is further particulars; he should clarify the Tribunal and us information on those issues he raised in his own pleadings.

Advertisement

Breaking: Enugu State Gov, Mbah Meets Tinubu For Release Of Nnamdi Kanu

“On 24th, we will be here for ruling and possibly conclusion of pre-hearing, and after pre-hearing and report is issued, we can now proceed to substantive hearing,” he added.

 

Follow us on Facebook

Post Disclaimer

The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author and forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of Anaedo Online or official policies of the Anaedo Online.

You may also like

Advertisement